JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 10, 1998

A- de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Roberto Henao Duque

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Aclaracion De La Sentencia C-492/96
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se rechazó por improcedente el escrito presentado por el accionante de la referencia, mediante el cual solicita aclaración de la Sentencia C-492/96.

Lo anterior, según explicó la Corporación, ninguna de las normas de la Constitución que reglamentan la jurisdicción constitucional, confiere a la Corte la facultad de aclarar sus sentencias.

Por el contrario, según el Art. 241, se le confía la guarda de la integridad y supremacía de la Constitución en los estrictos y precisos términos de este artículo.

Y entre las 11 funciones que cumple, no está tampoco la facultad de que se trata.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RECHAZASE por improcedente el escrito de ROBERTO HENAO DUQUE, de fecha veinticuatro (24) de noviembre de mil novecientos noventa y ocho (1998), mediante el cual solicita aclaracion de la Sentencia C-492 de 1996.
  2. Comuniquese, notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.